Scientific publications

Last changed: 17 August 2018

Some journals require subscription in order to be able to read the entire article. Please contact us ( if you can not access the article you want to read.

Eriksson, D. 2018. The Swedish policy approach to directed mutagenesis in a European contextPhysiologia Plantarum doi: 10.1111/ppl.12740

Gustafsson, C., Willforss, J., Lopes-Pinto, F., Ortiz, R. & Geleta, M. 2018. Identification of genes regulating traits targeted for domestication of field cress (Lepidium campestre) as a biennial and perennial oilseed cropBMC Genetics 19:36 1-15 doi: 10.1186/s12863-018-0624-9

Pourazari, F., Andersson, M. & Weih, M. 2018. Altered tuber yield in genetically modified high-amylose and oil potato lines is associated with changed whole-plant nitrogen economyFrontiers in Plant Science 9:342

Eriksson. D., Harwood, W., Hofvander, P., Jones, H., Rogowsky, P., Stöger, E. & Visser, R.G.F. 2018. A welcome proposal to amend the GMO legislation of the EUTrends in Biotechnology doi: 10.1016/j.tibtech.2018.05.001

Eriksson, D. 2018. Recovering the original intentions of risk assessment and management of genetically modified organisms in the European UnionFrontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology doi: 10.3389/fbioe.2018.00052

Andersson, M.,  Turesson, H., Olsson, N., Fält, A.S., Ohlsson, P., Gonzalez, M.N., Samuelsson, M. & Hofvander, P. 2018. Genome editing in potato via CRISPR‐Cas9 ribonucleoprotein deliveryPhysiologica Plantarum doi: 10.1111/ppl.12731

Burra, D.D., Lenman, M., Levander, F., Resjö, S. & Andreasson, E. 2018. Comparative membrane-associated proteomics of three different immune reactions in potato. International Journal of Molecular Sciences 19:538

Mesbah-Uddin, M., Guldbrandtsen, B., Iso-Touru, T., Vilkki, J., De Koning, D.J., Boichard, D., Lund, M.S., & Sahana, G. 2018. Genome-wide mapping of large deletions and their population-genetic properties in dairy cattle. DNA Research 25: 49-59

Ulén, B. & Aronsson, H. 2018. Nitrogen and phosphorus leaching under the potential biennial oilseed plant Lepidium campestre L. in a field trial. Acta Agriculturae Scandinavica, Section B - Soil & Plant Science 68:555-561

Eriksson, M., Ghosh, R., Hansson, E., Basnet, S., & Lagerkvist, C. J. 2018. Environmental consequences of introducing genetically modified soy feed in SwedenJournal of Cleaner Production 176: 46–53

Zhao, X., Andersson, M. & Andersson, R. 2018. Resistant starch and other dietary fiber components in tubers from a high-amylose potato. Food Chemistry 251: 58-63

Eriksson, D., de Andrade, E., Bohanec, B., Chatzopolou, S., Defez, R., Leiva Eriksson, N., van der Meer, P., van der Meulen, B., Ritala, A., Sági, L., Schiemann, J., Twardowski, T & Vaněk, T. 2018. Why the European Union needs a national GMO opt-in mechanismNature Biotechnology 36: 18-19

Eriksson, D. & Chatzopoulou, S. 2017. Responsible decision-making for plant research and breeding innovations in the European Union. GM Crops & Food 8(4)

Resjö, S., Brus, M., Ali, A., Meijer, H.G.J., Sandin, M., Govers, F., Levander, F., Grenville-Briggs, L., Andreasson, E. 2017. Proteomic analysis of Phytophthora infestans reveals the importance of cell wall proteins in pathogenicityMolecular and Cellular Proteomics 16:1958-1971

Butkowski, O.K., Pakseresht, A., Lagerkvist, C.J. & Bröring, S. 2017. Debunking the myth of consumer rejection of green genetic engineering: empirical evidence from Germany. International Journal of Consumer Studies 41:723-734

Pakseresht, A., McFadden, B.R. & Lagerkvist, C.J. 2017. Consumer acceptance of food biotechnology based on policy context and upstream acceptance: evidence from an artefactual field experiment. European Review of Agricultural Economics 44:757-780

Eriksson, D., Brinch-Pedersen, H. Chawade, A,. Holme, I.B., Hvoslef-Eide, T.A.K., Ritala, A., Teeri, T., & Thorstensen, T. 2017. Scandinavian perspectives on plant gene technology: applications, policies and progressPhysiologia Plantarum doi:10.1111/ppl.12661

Eriksson, S., Jonas, E., Rydhmer, L., & Röcklinsberg, H. 2017. Invited review: Breeding and ethical perspectives on genetically modified and genome edited cattle. Journal of Dairy Science 101:1–17

Ivarson E., Iven T., Sturtevant D., Ahlman A., Cai Y., Chapman K., Feussner I., & Zhu L-H. 2017. Production of wax esters in the wild oil species Lepidium campestreIndustrial Crops & Products 108: 535–542

Zetterberg, C. & K. Edvardsson Björnberg. 2017. Time for a new EU regulatory framework for GM crops? Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 30:325-347

Andersson, M., Turesson, H., Nicolia, A., Fält, A-S., Samuelsson, M., & Hofvander, P. 2017. Efficient targeted multiallelic mutagenesis in tetraploid potato (Solanum tuberosum) by transient CRISPR-Cas9 expression in protoplastsPlant Cell Reports 36: 117-128 

Sandin, P. 2017. How to label ‘natural’ foods: a matter of complexityFood Ethics 1-11

Eriksson, D., & Ammann, K. H. K. 2017. A universally acceptable view on the adoption of improved plant breeding techniquesFrontiers in Plant Science 7: 1999

Chawade, A., Alexandersson, E., Bengtsson, T., Andreasson, E., & Levander, F. 2016. Targeted proteomics approach for precision plant breedingJournal of proteome research 15(2), 638-646

Zetterberg, C. 2016. Hur säkert är det att bedriva ekologiskt jordbruk? Om samexistens i jordbrukslandskapet. Nordic Environmental Law Journal 2016:1 161-170

Hess, S., Lagerkvist, C. J., Redekop, W., & Pakseresht, A. 2016. Consumers’ evaluation of biotechnologically modified food products: new evidence from a meta-survey. European Review of Agricultural Economics 43 (5): 703-736

Ganeteg, U., Ahmad, I., Jämtgård, S., Aguetoni‐Cambui, C., Inselsbacher, E., Svennerstam, H., Schmidt, S., & Näsholm, T. 2016. Amino acid transporter mutants of Arabidopsis provides evidence that a non‐mycorrhizal plant acquires organic nitrogen from agricultural soilPlant, Cell & Environment DOI:10.1111/pce.12881

Ivarson, E., Leiva Eriksson, N., Ahlman, A., Kanagarajan, S., Bülow, L., & Zhu, L. H. 2016. Effects of overexpression of WRI1 and hemoglobin genes on the seed oil content of Lepidium campestreFrontiers in Plant Science 7: 2032.

Eriksson, D., Carlson-Nilsson, U., Ortíz, R., & Andreasson, E. 2016. Overview and breeding strategies of table potato production in Sweden and the Fennoscandian regionPotato Research 59: 279-294

Alexandersson, E., Mulugeta, T., Lankinen, Å., Liljeroth, E., & Andreasson, E. 2016. Plant resistance inducers against pathogens in Solanaceae species - from molecular mechanisms to field applicationInternational Journal of Molecular Sciences 17(10): 1673

Ivarsson, E., Ahlman A., Lager I., & Zhu, L-H. 2016. Significant increase of oleic acid level in the wild species Lepidium campestre through direct gene silencing. Plant Cell Reports35(10): 2055-2063

Muneer, F., Andersson, M., Koch, K., Hedenqvist, M. S., Gällstedt, M., Plivelic, T. S., Menzel, C., Rhazi, L., & Kuktaite, R. 2016. Innovative Gliadin/Glutenin and Modified Potato Starch Green Composites: Chemistry, Structure, and Functionality Induced by Processing. ACS Sustainable Chemistry & Engineering DOI:10.1021/acssuschemeng.6b00892

Rönnegård, L., McFarlane, S. E., Husby, A., Kawakami, T., Ellegren, H., & Qvarnström, A. 2016. Increasing the power of genome wide association studies in natural populations using repeated measures–evaluation and implementation. Methods in Ecology and Evolution 7(7), 792-799

Mao, X., Johansson, A. M., Sahana, G., Guldbrandtsen, B., & De Koning, D. J. 2016. Short communication: Imputation of markers on the bovine X chromosome. Journal of Dairy Science 99(9): 7313-7318

de Koning, D. J. 2016 Meuwissen et al. on Genomic Selection. Genetics 203(1): 5-7

Sahana, G., Iso-Touru, T., Wu, X., Nielsen, U. S., Koning, D. J., Lund, M. S., Vilkki, J., & Guldbrandtsen, B. 2016. A 0.5-Mbp deletion on bovine chromosome 23 is a strong candidate for stillbirth in Nordic Red cattle. Genetics Selection Evolution 48(1): 1

Gjerris, M., Gamborg, C., & Röcklinsberg, H. 2016 Ethical aspects of insect production for food and feed. Journal of Insects as Food and Feed 2 (2): 101-110

Tidåker, P., Bergkvist, G., Bolinder, M., Eckersten, H., Johnsson, H., Kätterer, T., & Weih, M. 2016. Estimating the environmental footprint of barley with improved nitrogen uptake efficiency - a Swedish scenario study. European Journal of Agronomy, 80, 45-54.

Sprink, T., Eriksson, D., Schiemann, J., & Hartung, F. 2016. Regulatory hurdles for genome editing: process-vs. product-based approaches in different regulatory contexts.Plant cell reports, 1-14.

Jonas, E., & de Koning, D.J. 2016. Goals and hurdles for a successful implementation of genomic selection in breeding programme for selected annual and perennial cropsBiotechnology and Genetic Engineering Reviews DOI:10.1080/02648725.2016.1177377

Hansson, S.O. 2016. How to be cautious but open to learning: time to update biotechnology and GMO legislation. Risk Analysis 36: 1513-1517

Lenman, M., Ali, A., Mühlenbock, P., Carlson-Nilsson, U., Liljeroth, E., Champouret, N., Vleeshouwers, V.G.A.A., & Andreasson, E. 2015. Effector-driven marker development and cloning of resistance genes against Phytophthora infestans in potato breeding clone SW93-1015. Theoretical and Applied Genetics, 1-11.

Brackin, R., Näsholm, T., Robinson, N., Guillou, S., Vinall, K., Lakshmanan, Schmidt, S., & Inselsbacher, E. 2015. Nitrogen fluxes at the root-soil interface show a mismatch of nitrogen fertilizer supply and sugarcane root uptake capacity. Scientific reports 5: 15727

Bassi, F. M., Bentley, A. R., Charmet G., Ortiz, R., & Crossa, J. 2015. Breeding schemes for the implementation of genomic selection in wheat (Triticum spp.). Plant Science DOI:10.1016/j.plantsci.2015.08.021

Kolseth, A. K., D’Hertefeldt, T., Emmerich, M., Forabosco, F., Marklund, S., Cheeke, T. E., Hallin, S., & Weih, M. 2015. Influence of genetically modified organisms on agro-ecosystem processesAgriculture, Ecosystems & Environment 214: 96-106

Menzel, C., Andersson, M., Andersson, R., Vázquez-Gutiérrez, J. L., Daniel, G., Langton, M., Gällstedt, M., & Koch, K. 2015. Improved material properties of solution cast starch films: Effect of varying amylopectin structure and amylose content of starch from genetically modified potatoes Carbohydrate Polymers 130: 388-397

Amuzu-Aweh, E.N., Bovenhuis, H., de Koning, D.J., & Bijma, P. 2015. Predicting heterosis for egg production traits in crossbred offspring of individual White Leghorn sires using genome-wide SNP data Genetics Selection Evolution 47: 27 DOI:10.1186/s12711-015-0088-6

Orquin, J., & Lagerkvist, C.J. 2015. Effects of salience are both short- and long-lived Acta Psychologica 160: 69-76

Fischer, K., Ekener Petersen, E., Rydhmer, L., & Edvardsson Björnberg, K. 2015. Social impacts of GM crops in agriculture: a systematic literature review Sustainability 7(7): 8598-8620

Burra, D.D., Mühlenbock, P., & Andreasson, E. 2015. Salicylic and jasmonic acid pathways are necessary for defense against Dickeya solani as revealed by a novel method for Blackleg disease screening of in vitro grown potato Plant Biology DOI:10.1111/plb.12339

Nicolia, A., Proux-Wéra, E., Åhman, I., Onkokesung, N., Andersson M., Andreasson, E., & Zhu, L-H. 2015. Targeted gene mutation in tetraploid potato through transient TALEN expression in protoplastsJournal of Biotechnology 204: 17-24

Edvardsson Björnberg, K., Marstorp, H., Jonas, E., & Tidåker, P. 2015. The role of biotechnology in sustainable agriculture: views and perceptions among key actors in the Swedish food supply chainSustainability 7(6): 7512-7529

Abreha, K.B., Alexandersson, E., Vossen, J.H., Anderson, P., & Andreasson, E. 2015. Inoculation of transgenic resistant potato by Phytophthora infestans affects host plant choice of a generalist mothPLOS One DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0129815

Wullschleger, S.W., Breen, A.M., Iversen, C.M., Olson, M.S., Näsholm, T., Ganeteg, U., Wallenstein, M.D., & Weston, D.J. 2015. Genomics in a changing Arctic: Critical questions await the molecular ecologistMolecular Ecology 24: 2301-2309

Moula, P., & Sandin, P. 2015. Evaluating ethical toolsMetaphilosophy 46: 263–279

Sandin, M., Chawade, A., & Levander, F. 2015. Is label-free LC-MS/MS ready for biomarker discovery? Proteomics Clinical Applications 9: 289–294

Orquin, J.L., Ashby, N., & Clarke, A. 2015. Areas of interest as a signal detection problem for behavioral eye tracking research. Journal of Behavioral Decision MakingDOI:10.1002/bdm.1867

Jonas, E., & de Koning, D.J. 2015. Genomic selection needs to be carefully assessed to meet specific requirements in livestock breeding programs (Review). Frontiers in Genetics6: 49

Muneer, F., Andersson, M., Koch, K., Menzel, C., Hedenqvist, M.S., Gällstedt, M., Plivelic, T.S., & Kuktaite, R. 2015. Nanostructural morphology of plasticized wheat gluten and modified potato starch composites: Relationship to mechanical and barrier properties.Biomacromolecules 16: 695-705

Chawade, A., Sandin, M., Teleman, J., Malmström, J., & Levander, F. 2015. Data processing has major impact on the outcome of quantitative label-free LC-MS analysisJournal of Proteome Research 14: 676-687

Teleman, J., Röst, H.L., Rosenberger, G., Schmitt, U., Malmström, L., Malmström, J., & Levander, F. 2015. DIANA-algorithmic improvements for analysis of data-independent acquisition MS dataBioinformatics 31: 555-562

Moula, P. 2015. GM Crops, the hubris argument and the nature of agricultureJournal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 28: 161-177

Chatzopoulou S. 2014. Unpacking the mechanisms of the EU ‘throughput’ governance legitimacy – the case of EFSA. European Politics and Society. DOI:10.1080/23745118.2014.974312

Franklin, O., Palmroth, S., & Näsholm, T. 2014. How eco-evolutionary principles may guide tree breeding and tree biotechnology for enhanced productionTree Physiology34(11): 1149-1166

Näsholm, T., Palmroth, S., Ganeteg, U., Moshelion, M., Hurry, V., & Franklin, O. 2014. Genetics of superior growth traits in trees are being mapped but will the faster-growing risk-takers make it in the wild? Tree Physiology 34(11): 1141-1148

Geleta, M., Zhu, L.H., Stymne, S., Lehrman, A., & Hansson, S.O. 2014. Domestication of Lepidium campestre as part of Mistra Biotech, a research programme focused on agro-biotechnology for sustainable food, in Batello, C., Wade, L., Cox, S., Pogna, N., Bozzini, A., & Choptiany, J. (Eds.) Perennial crops for food security. Proceedings of the FAO expert workshop, Rome, Italy, 28-30 August 2013 (pp. 141-147). FAO, Italy.

Alexandersson, E., Jacobson, D., Vivier, M.A., Weckwerth, W., & Andreasson, E. 2014. Field-omics – understanding large-scale molecular data from fieldFrontiers in Plant Science 5 DOI:10.3389/fpls.2014.

Abera Desta, Z., & Ortiz, R. 2014. Genomic selection: genome-wide prediction in plant improvementTrends in Plant Science 19: 592-601

Ali, A., Alexandersson, E., Sandin, M., Resjö, S., Lenman, M., Hedley, P., Levander, F., & Andreasson, E. 2014. Quantitative proteomics and transcriptomics of potato in response to Phytophthora infestans in compatible and incompatible interactionsBMC Genomics 15: 497

Teleman, J., Dowsey, A.W., Gonzalez-Galarza, F.F., Perkins, S., Pratt, B., Rost, H., Malmström, L., Malmström, J., Jones, A.R., Deutsch, E.W., & Levander, F. 2014. Numerical compression schemes for proteomics mass spectrometry dataMolecular and Cellular Proteomics 13:1537-1542

Lonhienne, T.G.A., Trusov, Y., Young, A., Rentsch, D., Näsholm, T., Schmidt, S., & Paungfoo-Lonhienne, C. 2014. Effects of externally supplied protein on root morphology and biomass allocation in ArabidopsisScientific Reports 4: 5055

Baard, P., & Edvardsson Björnberg, K. 2014. Cautious utopias: Environmental goal-setting with long time framesEthics, Policy and Environment

Näsholm, T. 2014. Old roots contribute to nitrogen uptake by tree seedlingsTree Physiology 34(4): 331-333

Gruffman, L., Jämtgård, S., & Näsholm, T. 2014. Plant nitrogen status and co-occurrence of organic- and inorganic nitrogen sources influence root uptake by Scots pine seedlingsTree Physiology 34(2): 205-213

Chawade, A,. Alexandersson, E., & Levander, F. 2014. Normalyzer: A tool for rapid evaluation of normalization methods for omics data setsJournal of Proteome Research 13: 3114–3120 

Oyewole, O., Inselsbacher, E., & Näsholm, T. 2014. Direct estimation of mass flow and diffusion of nitrogen compounds in solution and soilNew Phytologist 201: 1056-1064

Peschel, A.O., & Orquin, J.L. 2013. A review of the findings and theories on surface size effects on visual attention. Frontiers in Psychology 4: 902

Lidskog, R., Sundqvist, G., Kall, A-S., Sandin, P. & Larsson, S. 2013. Intensive forestry in Sweden: Stakeholders' evaluation of benefits and riskJournal of Integrative Environmental Sciences 10: 145-160

Ivarson, E., Ahlman, A., Li, X.Y. & Zhu, L.H. 2013. Development of an efficient regeneration and transformation method for the new potential oilseed crop Lepidium campestreBMC Plant Biology 13:115

Peterson, M., & Sandin, P. 2013. The last man argument revisitedJournal of Value Inquiry37: 121-133

Jonas, E., & de Koning, D.J. 2013. Does genomic selection have a future in plant breeding?  Trends in Biotechnology 31: 497–504

 Orquin, J.L., & Mueller Loose, S. 2013. Attention and choice: A review on eye movements in decision makingActa Psychologica 144: 190-206

Hess, S., Lagerkvist, C.J., Redekop, W., & Pakseresht, A. 2013. Consumers' Evaluation of Biotechnology in Food Products: New Evidence from a Meta-Survey. Agricultural and Applied Economics Association 2013 Annual Meeting, August 4-6, 2013, Washington, D.C.

Bradu, C., Orquin, J.L., & Thøgersen, J. 2014. The mediated influence of a traceability label on consumer willingness to buy the labeled productJournal of Business Ethics 124: 283-295

Orquin, J.L., Bagger, M., & Mueller Loose, S. 2013. Learning affects top down and bottom up modulation of eye movements in decision makingJudgment and Decision Making 8: 700-716

Sandin, P., Mårald, E., Davison, A., Nye D.E., & Thompson, P.B. 2013. Book Symposium on The Agrarian Vision: Sustainability and Environmental Ethics by Paul B. ThompsonPhilosophy and Technology 26: 301-320

Forabosco, F., Sundström, F.L., and Rydhmer, L. 2013. An algorithm for the identification of genetically modified animalsTrends in Biotechnology 31: 272-274

Forabosco, F., Löhmus, M., Rydhmer, L., and Sundström, L.F.  2013. Genetically modified farm animals and fish in agriculture: A review Livestock Science 153: 1-9

Forabosco, F. and Rydhmer, L. 2012. The current status and future prospects of genetically modified farm animals in Europe Genomics and Quantitative Genetics. 5: 1-4

Hansson, S.O., and Joelsson, K. 2012. Crop Biotechnology for the Environment? Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics. DOI:10.1007/s10806-012-9405-z


+46 (0)18 672232