Print Syllabus

Syllabus

EX1028 Independent project in Food Science A2E - Agriculture, 30.0 Credits

Självständigt arbete i livsmedelsvetenskap för agronomer, A2E

Subjects

Food Science

Education cycle

Master’s level

Modules

Title	Credits	Code
Single module	30.0	0001

Advanced study in the main field

Second cycle, contains degree project for Master of Arts/Master of Science (120 credits)
Master’s level (A2E)

Grading scale

Language

Swedish

Prior knowledge

Knowledge equivalent to

- A 15 credits independent project (Bachelor thesis) in Food Science
- 30 credits at second-cycle level in Food Science
- 75 credits from courses with an agronomist profile
- 30 credits in Agricultural Science
- At least one course of relevance to the topic of the project must have been completed before the start of the course
- Swedish equivalent to the general entry requirements for courses or study programmes that begin in the first cycle and that are intended for new entrants to higher education
- Knowledge in English equivalent to English 6

Objectives

The aim of the course is for the student, based on previously acquired knowledge, to independently plan, carry out and present an academic study within a given time frame. Through the independent project, the student will develop their skills in the academic work process and deepen their subject knowledge considerably.

On completion of the course, the student will be able to:

• independently and creatively identify and formulate scientific questions;
• independently search, compile, evaluate and critically interpret relevant information and literature;
• within given time frames, independently plan and by using adequate methods carry out a scientific study related to the agricultural sector;
• analyse and evaluate data and/or findings on a scientific basis;
• discuss contents and conclusions in a scientific work critically, and reflect on how the choice of question and method relates to the scientific and practical basis of the subject;
• reflect on social and ethical aspects, sustainability aspects within the subject as well as ethical aspects of research and development;
• present a scientific work in accordance with the prevailing practice of the discipline, adapted to the intended audience and according to the instructions given;
• write a summary in English of a scientific report according to the instructions given;
• write a popular science summary of a scientific work according to the instructions given;
• present a scientific work orally and critically review and discuss, as well as give constructive criticism of, another student’s project, including method, conclusions and the context of the work in a wider perspective;
• identify their own skill and knowledge development needs in the subject of the project,
• relate the scientific questions to the agriculture sector’s complex system of resources and value-creating processes.

Content

The course involves carrying out an independent, academic project (degree project) under supervision. The project is to be carried out independently, using data collected by the student themselves, or equivalent data. The project should preferably be carried out individually, but the course coordinator can admit exceptions under certain circumstances.

The set-up of the independent project should be documented in a work plan established in consultation with the supervisor, at the start of the project.

The project is to be presented orally and in writing, as a seminar or an equivalent format, and according to the instructions given. The course includes carrying out an opposition where the ability to give constructive criticism is examined.

Grading form

The grade requirements within the course grading system are set out in specific criteria. These criteria must be available by the course start at the latest.

Formats and requirements for examination

A Pass grade for the written report and the oral presentation, as well as a Pass grade for the opposition of another student’s project. If the work has been carried out in pairs, it must be made clear to the examiner what each individual has contributed; this applies to both the written report and the oral presentation. The work effort and the scope of the work should correspond to 30 credits for each student, and each student must fulfil all intended learning outcomes.

• If a student has failed an examination, the examiner has the right to issue supplementary assignments. This applies if it is possible and there are grounds to do so.

• The examiner can provide an adapted assessment to students entitled to study support for students with disabilities following a decision by the university. Examiners may also issue an adapted examination or provide an alternative way for the students to take the exam.

• If this syllabus is withdrawn, SLU may introduce transitional provisions for examining students admitted based on this syllabus and who have not yet passed the course.

• For the assessment of an independent project (degree project), the examiner may also allow a student to add supplemental information after the deadline for submission. Read more in the Education Planning and Administration Handbook.

Other information

• The right to participate in teaching and/or supervision only applies for the course instance the student was admitted to and registered on.

• If there are special reasons, students are entitled to participate in components with compulsory attendance when the course is given again. Read more in the Education Planning and Administration Handbook.

Responsible department

Department of Molecular Sciences