Meeting landscape 2
Course evaluation
The course evaluation is not yet activated
The course evaluation is open between 2025-01-12 and 2025-02-02
Additional course evaluations for LK0297
Academic year 2023/2024
Meeting landscape 2 (LK0297-20039)
2023-10-31 - 2024-01-14
Academic year 2022/2023
Meeting landscape 2 (LK0297-20182)
2022-11-01 - 2023-01-15
Academic year 2021/2022
Meeting landscape 2 (LK0297-20137)
2021-11-02 - 2022-01-16
Academic year 2020/2021
Meeting landscape 2 (LK0297-20066)
2020-11-02 - 2021-01-17
Academic year 2019/2020
Meeting landscape 2 (LK0297-20105)
2019-11-01 - 2020-01-19
Academic year 2018/2019
Meeting landscape 2 (LK0297-20024)
2018-11-06 - 2019-01-20
Academic year 2017/2018
Meeting landscape 2 (LK0297-20089)
2017-10-30 - 2018-01-14
Syllabus and other information
Syllabus
LK0297 Meeting landscape 2, 15.0 Credits
Möte med landskap 2Subjects
Landscape Architecture Landscape ArchitectureEducation cycle
Bachelor’s levelModules
Title | Credits | Code |
---|---|---|
Single module | 15.0 | 0301 |
Advanced study in the main field
First cycle, has only upper-secondary level entry requirementsBachelor’s level (G1N)
Grading scale
The grade requirements within the course grading system are set out in specific criteria. These criteria must be available by the course start at the latest.
Language
SwedishPrior knowledge
Knowledge equivalent to general entry requirements and:- Mathematics 3b or Mathematics 3c
- Science studies 2
- Social studies 1b or Social studies 1a1 + 1a2
Objectives
The course intends, together with the course ’Meeting landscape 1’, to provide students at the Landscape Architect programme, Alnarp basic knowledge of the landscape, landscape architecture, the role and working methods of Landscape Architects, and to function as an introduction to the program. After completing the course the students will be able to:
Understand how to interpret the gardens, parks and landscapes with the intension to conserve, use and develop them according to their cultural context
Write an academic paper about a historic site that reflects a holistic view on management and inclusive perspectives
Explain basic concepts such as site preferences, seasonal variation, growth zone, climatic aspects, succession, competition strategies and plant geography
Describe and explain the basics of vegetation development and its relation to the site preference and creative plant use, and perform basic analyzes of existing vegetation systems, discuss their potential development and anticipate developments over time.
Analyze and critically examine how they work with spatial design using a variety of visual tools, and visually and verbally communicate and explain their observations / their design through different presentation techniques and methods
Identify and describe subjective values and underlying structure on a site by using visual form descriptive concepts
Show how landscape architecture is multidisciplinary and complex
Content
A persistent pedagogical foundation of the courses during the first semester’s education at a Landscape Architect program, Alnarp, is an integrated perspective on course implementation and learning, where the combination of different areas of knowledge contributes to students’ understanding of the landscape and of complexity and the context in landscape architecture.
This is achieved through teaching that takes a standpoint in the studies of a couple of main sites and their history, characteristics and expressions in which the quest for understanding of landscape phenomena largely influences the content and pedagogy of the course. This means that the focus of the course will be conducted by the main sites that are being studied. Other additional reference sites is used to relate and deepening the knowledge.
As a central part of an integrated learning, the students will practice how to analyze, process and synthesize knowledge through methods central for the Landscape Architect (eg, sketching, writing, visualizing and presenting). These repeated tasks allow for a deeper process of achieving knowledge and for training the communication skills of the students. The goal is that the course during the semester will give the students an approach to knowledge and methods that provides the students with tools to successfully attend the following courses in the program, and lay the foundation for future employment as a Landscape Architect.
The course is conducted through excursions, study trips, seminars, lectures, individual assignments, group projects and exams. Many parts of the course are experience-based, such as field trips, hikes, etc. There should be moments in the course that enable explorations of aspects that are not known in advance.
For short periods, the student is given the opportunity to immerse themselves into an optional area of landscape architecture and present it appropriately. During the course the students compile data for a portfolio compilation and an exhibition that ends the course and semester.
With the main sites, reference sites, an integrated perspective on learning and synthesizing techniques, the course intends to primarily convey the knowledge and skills within three to extent equally represented knowledge areas: applied arts, garden and landscape history and plant knowledge. In the course will also the employment and work of Landscape Architects constitute an aspect, which aims to increase the understanding of the profession’s role in today’s community design and planning. Other content includes introductions to the design, planning and management theory. Seminars, presentations, excursions and study trip are compulsory.
Grading form
The grade requirements within the course grading system are set out in specific criteria. These criteria must be available by the course start at the latest.Formats and requirements for examination
Approved assignments and written examinations.
Approved participation in compulsory parts.
If a student has failed an examination, the examiner has the right to issue supplementary assignments. This applies if it is possible and there are grounds to do so.
The examiner can provide an adapted assessment to students entitled to study support for students with disabilities following a decision by the university. Examiners may also issue an adapted examination or provide an alternative way for the students to take the exam.
If this syllabus is withdrawn, SLU may introduce transitional provisions for examining students admitted based on this syllabus and who have not yet passed the course.
For the assessment of an independent project (degree project), the examiner may also allow a student to add supplemental information after the deadline for submission. Read more in the Education Planning and Administration Handbook.
Other information
The right to participate in teaching and/or supervision only applies for the course instance the student was admitted to and registered on.
If there are special reasons, students are entitled to participate in components with compulsory attendance when the course is given again. Read more in the Education Planning and Administration Handbook.
Responsible department
Department of Landscape Architecture, Planning and Management
Further information
Litterature list
Albers, Josef. (1981). Albers färglära. Forum. S. 13-19
Bodin m.fl. (2021). *Arkitektens handbok. *Svensk byggtjänst. S. 26-27
Persson, Per-Ola. (1979). *Perspektivlära för arkitekter. *Göteborg: CTH arkitektur-visualiseringsteknik. Valda sidor.
Reid, Grant W. (2002). Landscape Graphics. New York: Watson-Guptill. S. 17-26, 52-59, 62-93, 98-109, 151, 188-197
Andersson, Thorbjörn (2013). Landskapsarkitekturens historia i Sverige 1920-1990. I: Guide till Svensk Landskapsarkitektur. Arkitektur förlag, sid. 225-239.
Blennow, Anna-Maria (1995). Europas trädgårdar. Signum. Modernismens trädgårdskonst, sid. 313-362
Gustavsson, Eva (2023). Delar av kapitlet Prydnads- och landskapsväxter. I: Svensk trädgårdshistoria: 1800- och 1900-tal, med bidrag av Allan Gunnarsson, Eva Gustavsson, Åsa Klintborg Ahlklo, Catharina Nolin, Inger Olausson, Matti Wiking Leino. Kungl. Vitterhetsakademien, sid. 301-345.
Kling, Anders (2013). Landskapsarkitekturens historia i Sverige 1990-2010. I: Guide till Svensk Landskapsarkitektur. Arkitektur förlag, sid. 239-247.
Persson, Agneta och Persson, Bengt (1995). Svenska bostadsgårdar 1930-59. Byggforskningsrådet. sid 25-33, sid. 53-75
Sjöman H. & Slagstedt J. (2015) Träd i urbana landskap, Lund: Studentlitteratur, S. 231 – 322
Saebö A. m. fl. (2003) Selection of trees for urban forestry
Sjöman & Lagerström (2007) Stadens hårdgjorda miljöer som växtplats. Gröna Fakta 5/2007
Baskinger, M & Bardel, W. (2013). Drawing idéas – a hand drawn approach for better design. New York: Watson Guptill. S. 8-9, 139-140
Bodin m.fl. (2021). *Arkitektens handbok. *Svensk byggtjänst. S. 162-170
Cross, Nigel. (2011). Design thinking. New York: Bloomsbury visual arts. S. 1-90, 115-149
Hoffman, Alma R. (2020). Sketching as design thinking. New York: Routledge. S. 17-23, 121-122
Kirby Lockard, William. (2000). Design Drawing Experiences. New York: Norton. S. 51-64
Krupinska, Jadwiga. (2016). Att skapa det tänkta. Lund: Studentlitteratur. S 127-131, 134-140, 143-145
Murphy, Michael D. (2016). Landscape Architecture Theory. Washington: Island Press. S. 200-215
Reid, Grant W. (2002). Landscape Graphics. New York: Watson-Guptill, s. 7-11, 45-61
Wikberg N, Åsa m. fl. (2017). Design: Process och metod. Lund: Studentlitteratur. S. 10-11, 16-17, 28-31, 104-105, 108-111, 118