Ny sökning
BI1378

Skoglig naturvårdsbiologi

Information från kursledaren

Most welcome to the course in Forest Conservation Biology!

The course is a distance course, and will run at a 50% pace from January to June 2023.

There will be one mandatory physical meeting during the course, whe we will meet in Uppsala for two full days of excursions. This will take place 4-5 May. Please book these dates in your calendar alreay now!

The course consist of both asynchronous and synchronous activities. Asynchronous activities are e.g. recorded lectures that you can follow when it suits you, and assignments that you can work on when it suit you but hand in before a given deadline. Synchronous activities are for example literature seminars, discussions and exercises, where you meet teachers and fellow students online at a specified time. The synchrounous activities are always scheduled Thursdays and Fridays (with one Wednesday as an exception!).

Please note that some of the synchonous activites are mandatory!

If you have any questions regarding the course, please do not hesitate to contact me.

/Erik Öckinger

Kursvärdering

Kursvärderingen är avslutad

BI1378-30165 - Sammanställning av kursvärdering

Efter att kursvärderingen stängt har kursansvarig och studentrepresentanten upp till en månad på sig att skriva kommentarer. De publiceras automatiskt i sammanställningen.

Andra kursvärderingar för BI1378

Läsåret 2024/2025

Skoglig naturvårdsbiologi (BI1378-20119)

2024-11-01 - 2025-01-19

Läsåret 2023/2024

Skoglig naturvårdsbiologi (BI1378-30088)

2024-01-15 - 2024-06-02

Läsåret 2023/2024

Skoglig naturvårdsbiologi (BI1378-20046)

2023-10-31 - 2024-01-14

Läsåret 2022/2023

Skoglig naturvårdsbiologi (BI1378-20115)

2022-11-01 - 2023-01-15

Läsåret 2021/2022

Skoglig naturvårdsbiologi (BI1378-30027)

2022-01-17 - 2022-06-05

Läsåret 2020/2021

Skoglig naturvårdsbiologi (BI1378-30289)

2021-01-18 - 2021-06-06

Kursplan och övrig information

Betygskriterier

The grade for the entire course is based on the grades on the debate, the excursion and the written exams (including the assignment in genetics) described below.

Debate and debate article, 2.0 credits

Scale: 5, 4, 3 or U (fail) (which is used for the grading of the course, but for the module only Pass or Fail is visible)

To pass this module the student needs to participate in the scheduled debate and write a debate article before the indicated deadline.

To get grade 3 requires:

- Active participation in oral debate.

- Article with 1-2 arguments with some support.

- Article with appropriate language and structure.

To get grade 4 requires:

- Everything required for grade 3.

- The article is delivered before the indicated deadline

- The article should have at least 3 arguments, which are highly relevant and well-supported.

- The article should be easy to read, which means that it is linguistically correct and well structured.

To get grade 5 requires:

- Everything required for grade 4.

- The article has throughout an argumentation that is clear and logical.

- The text is throughout well-written and concise.

Literature seminars, 2.0 credits

Scale: Pass or Fail

To pass this module the student needs to participate in the six scheduled online seminars. This means that the student (i) is prepared to discuss questions for each scientific paper, and (ii) presents scientific papers for the group members when responsible, according to the instructions for the seminars.

Excursion, 2.0 credits

Scale: 5, 4, 3, and U (fail) (which is used for the grading of the course, but for the module only Pass or Fail is visible).

To get grade 3 requires:

- Participate in the excursion 21-22 April

- Do all field work and answer all questions according to the instructions in the assignment called “Compare disturbance regime and conservation values”

To get grade 4 requires:

- Everything required for grade 3.

- The assignment is delivered before the indicated deadline.

- The answers to several of the questions reveals a broad and deep knowledge of the subject.

- The answers are easy to read, since they are linguistically correct and well-structured.

To get grade 5 requires:

- Everything required for grade 4.

- The answers to most of the questions reveals a broad and deep knowledge of the subject.

- The text shows an ability to connect the field observations with general knowledge about forest ecology.

- The text is throughout concise.

Written exam, 9.0 credits

Scale: 5, 4, 3, and U (fail)

The written exam consists of three parts: the written part of the assignment in Conservation genetics, and two take home exams.

The written report in the Conservation genetics assignment will be assessed as follows:

To get grade 3 requires: Shows comprehensive understanding of conservation genetics concepts

To get grade 4 requires: Shows comprehensive understanding and an ability to link together conservation genetics concepts in a logical way

To get grade 5 requires: Shows depth and breadth in understanding of conservation genetics concepts and an ability to link together conservation genetics concepts in a logical way

The written exam will test the ability regarding the following aspects:

- Describe nature conservation with respect to its societal context, explain its scientific foundations, and structurally discuss underlying ethical values; - Explain important theories and concepts in population biology, community ecology, ecosystem ecology, and landscape ecology and their application in forest-related nature conservation; - Define biodiversity and compare different ways to assess biodiversity in forest ecosystems; - Describe the natural conditions and processes in Swedish forests, how anthropogenic disturbance affect biodiversity, and propose appropriate conservation and restoration approaches; - Describe different types of conservation measures taken in Swedish forested landscapes - Explain the roles of actors in the forest sector regarding nature conservation and give examples on how their perspectives on nature conservation differ - Give examples on how ecological knowledge can be combined by knowledge in other disciplines to find solutions in nature conservation, for instance when handling conflicting goals in multifunctional forests.

To get grade 3 requires

- Basic abilities regarding all seven aspects described above. Basic abilities means that key terms can be explained and patterns described.

To get grade 4 requires

- Everything required for grade three.

- Everything required for all modules (debate article, excursion, written exam) have been sent in before the deadlines.

- For several of these aspects, the student shows a knowledge which especially is deeper, but also wider. This means that also processes behind the patterns can be explained and that the patterns can be described from different perspectives. Wider knowledge means that a larger number of terms can be explained and more patterns be described relevant for forest conservation biology.

- The student can make a reasonable choice about which knowledge that should be used in different practical examples.

To get grade 5 requires

- Everything required for grade four

- For almost all of these seven aspects, the student shows especially a deep, but also wide, knowledge. This means that also processes behind the patterns can be explained and that different perspectives on the same patterns can be compared. Wider knowledge means that a larger number of terms can be explained and more patterns be described relevant for forest conservation biology.

- The student can discuss which knowledge that should be used in different practical examples and the consequences of different choices.

Litteraturlista

**Literature list – Forest Conservation Biology 2023
**

Sodhi & Ehrlich 2010. Conservation Biology for all, (Oxford University Press), available online at: 
https://conbio.org/publications/free-textbook

Forest conservation biology in society

Sodhi & Ehrlich Chapter 1-2

Hortal, J. et al. (2015) Seven shortfalls that beset large-scale knowledge of biodiversity. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Evol. Syst. 46: 523-549.

Ecological concepts

Sodhi & Ehrlich Chapter 10

Conservation Genetics

Groom, M.J. et al. (2005) Chapter 11 Conservation genetics: the use and importance of genetic information. In: Principles of Conservation Biology. 3rd ed. Pp. 375-415.

Supple, M.A. & Shapiro, B. (2018) Conservation of biodiversity in the genomics era. Genome Biology 19:131.

Landscape planning, extinction debts and colonisation credits

Sodhi & Ehrlich Chapter 5

Jackson, S.T. & Sax, D.F. (2010) Balancing biodiversity in a changing environment: extinction debt, immigration credit and species turnover. TREE 25: 153-160.

Kuussaari, M. et al. (2009). Extinction debt: a challenge for biodiversity conservation. TREE 24:564-571.

Metapopulation ecology

Hanski, I. & Gaggiotti. O.E. (2004). Metapopulation biology: past, present, and future. In: Ecology, genetics, and evoluation of metapopulations. Pp. 3-22.

Population viability analysis

Ranius, T. A population viability analysis of a beetles inhabiting hollow trees

Indicators and other surrogate tools

Butchart, S.H.M. et al. (2010) Global biodiversity: indicators of recent declines. Science 328: 1164-1168.

Disturbances and conservation values in boreal and nemoral forests

Kuuluvainen, T. (2002) Natural variability of forests as a reference for restoring and managing biological diversity in boreal Fennoscandia. Silva Fennica 36: 97-125.

Ramberg, E. et al. (2018) Coordination through databases can improve pre-scribed burning as a conservation tool to promote forest biodiversity. Ambio 47: 298–306

Nilsson, S.G. et al. (2008) Biodiversity and sustainable forestry in changing landscapes – principles and southern Sweden as an example. Journal of Sustainable Forestry 21: 11–43.

Non-native species
Sodhi & Ehrlich Chapter 7

Climate change and biodiversity

Sodhi & Ehrlich Chapter 8

Felton, A. 2016. How climate change adaptation and mitigation strategies can threaten or enhance the biodiversity of production forests: Insights from Sweden. Biological Conservation 194: 11-20.

Ranius, T. et al. 2023. Protected area designation and management in a world of climate change: A review of recommendations. Ambio 52: 68-80.

Large herbivores

Edenius, L., Bergman, M., Ericsson, G. & Danell, K. 2002. The role of moose as a disturbance factor in managed boreal forests. Silva Fennica 36: 57-67.

Forestry and biodiversity conservation

Felton, A. et al. 2020. Keeping pace with forestry: Multi-scale conservation in a changing production forest matrix. Ambio 49: 1050-1064.

FAO 2018. Forest Policy – Basic knowledge.

Restoration and rewilding

Bullock, J.M. et al. 2011. Restoration of ecosystem services and biodiversity: conflicts and opportunities. TREE 26: 542-549.

Nogues-Bravo, D. et al. 2016. Rewilding is the new Pandora’s box in conservation. Current Biology Magazine 26: R87-R91

Seddon, P.J. et al. 2014. Reversing defaunation: Restoring species in a changing world. Science 345: 406-412.

Cost-effectiveness

Schröter, M. et al. (2014) Ecosystem services and opportunity costs shift spatial priorities for conserving forest biodiversity. PLOSOne 9:e112557

Urban ecology

Fay, N. & Butler, J. (2017) Chapter 33. Conservation of ancient and other veteran trees. Routledge handbook of urban forestry.

Duinker, P.N. et al. (2017) Chapter 34. Urban woodlands and their management. Routledge handbook of urban forestry.

Sodhi & Ehrlich Chapter 13.7, P. 253.

Literature seminar articles

Vellend et al. 2006. Extinction debt of forest plants persist for more than a century following habitat fragmentation. Ecology 87: 542-548.

Jonason et al. 2014. Vegetation in clear‐cuts depends on previous land use: a century‐old grassland legacy. Ecology & Evolution 4: 4287-4295.

Groves et al. 2012. Incorporating climate change into systematic conservation planning. Biodiversity & Conservation 21: 1651-1671.

Warren et al. 2018. The projected effect on insects, vertebrates, and plants of limiting global warming to 1.5°C rather than 2°C. Science 360: 791-795.

Simonsson et al. 2016. Conservation values of certified-driven voluntary forest set-asides. Forest Ecology and Management 375:249-258.

Sverdrup-Thygeson et al. 2014. Spatial and temporal scales relevant for conservation of dead-wood associated species: current status and perspectives. Biodiversity Conservation 23:513-535.

Felton A. et al. 2020. Keeping pace with forestry: Multi-scale conservation in a changing production forest matrix. Ambio 49: 1050–1064

Nieminen 2020. No evidence of systematic pre-emptive loggings after notifying landowners of their lands’ conservation potential. Ambio (2020): 1-10.

Sidemo-Holm et al. 2022. Urbanization causes biotic homogenization of woodland bird communities at multiple spatial scales. Global Change Biology 28: 6152-6164.

Sjöman et al. 2016. Diversification of the urban forest – Can we afford to exclude exotic tree species? Urban Forestry & Urban Greening 18: 237-241.

Kursfakta

Kursen ges som en fristående kurs: Ja Kursen ges som en programkurs: Skogsbruk med många mål Skogsmästarprogrammet Kursavgift: Studieavgift, endast för medborgare utanför EU, EES, och Schweiz: 38060 SEK Nivå: Avancerad nivå (A1N)
Ämne: Skogsvetenskap Biologi Skogsvetenskap
Kurskod: BI1378 Anmälningskod: SLU-30165 Plats: Uppsala Distanskurs: Ja Undervisningsspråk: Engelska Ansvarig institution: Institutionen för ekologi Studietakt: 50%