Communication theory and strategy
This course instance is exclusively for incoming exchange students
Course description
There are numerous ideas about what communication is and how communication can be used strategically. During this course we study, apply, and compare different theoretical perspectives on communication. We also develop an understanding of communication in practice by reading about models for strategies, investigating how others work with it, and by developing a strategy for a communication project. The course aims to connect thinking about communication theories and strategies, and to establish critical and reflexive perspectives on communication theories and strategies.
Entry Requirements
Course facts
- Course name
- Communication theory and strategy
- Swedish course name
- Kommunikationsteori och strategi
- Level
- Second cycle (A1F)
- Main field of study
- Environmental Science
- Credits
- 15.0 credits
- Rate of study
- 100 %
- Study location
- Uppsala
- Form of instruction
- Campus-based instruction
- Application code
- SLU-M2114
- Course code
- MX0158
- Course language
- English
- Offered as a freestanding course
- Yes
- Tuition fee
-
Tuition fees only for non-EU/EEA/Switzerland citizens
0 SEK
MX0158, Communication theory and strategy, 15.0 Hp
Print syllabus
Syllabus
Finalized by: Camilo Calderon, 2024-11-05
Valid from : Autumn semester 2025 (2025-09-01)
Level
Second cycle (A1F)
Main field of study
Environmental Science
Grading Scale
5 / 4 / 3 / U
The grade requirements within the course grading system are set out in specific criteria. These criteria must be available by the course start at the latest.
Course language
English
Entry Requirements
Objectives
Preparing students for a professional role in environmental communication, the aim of the course is to facilitate students’ development of concepts, models, and language that allow deep theoretical and practical reflection about communication, as well as application thereof.
Upon completion of the course, the student should be able to:
- discuss different theoretical perspectives on communication and illustrate how communication functions differently according to these;
- explain how different theoretical perspectives on communication relate to the concepts of social change, power and inequality, agency and structure;
- prepare a communication strategy and discuss how different theoretical perspectives implicate such strategy and its implementation;
- discuss how communication strategies connect to issues of social change, and power and inequality.
Content
Subject-related content
The course includes a theoretical and a practical component. In the theoretical component, students will learn to recognize, compare, and apply a variety of theoretical perspectives on communication, including instrumental and constitutive perspectives. This is done through literature studies, lectures, and discussions in seminars.
In the practical component, students will learn about communication practice through literature studies and lectures. They apply these insights in experience-based workshops and a project. These experience-based workshops will engage students with models for developing strategies for communication activities, practical examples, and case studies from Sweden or other countries. In the project, students develop their own communication strategy based on theoretical and practical considerations. Active participation in workshops and activities of the project is mandatory.
Throughout the course, connections between theory and practice are discussed, and together we reflect on communication practice using communication theories. This also includes a thorough engagement with assumptions about social change, power and inequality, and agency and structure.
Teaching formats
To further student learning and promote discussion, a variety of methods are used:
Lectures, literature studies, workshops, (written) assignments, project work, seminars, study visits, proficiency training, presentations.
The course focuses on the following generic competencies:
Critical thinking, problem solving, oral communication, written communication, teamwork, ability to work autonomously, plan and manage time, creativity.
The following components are mandatory:
See course schedule.
Collaboration with the surrounding community takes place through:
Project work, study visits, guest lectures.
Examination Formats and Requirements for Passing the Course
- Passed written or oral exam(s) - Active participation in mandatory activities - Active participation in project work For further information, please refer to the course schedule.
- If a student has failed an examination, the examiner has the right to issue supplementary assignments. This applies if it is possible and there are grounds to do so.
- The examiner can provide an adapted assessment to students entitled to study support for students with disabilities following a decision by the university. Examiners may also issue an adapted examination or provide an alternative way for the students to take the exam.
- If this syllabus is withdrawn, SLU may introduce transitional provisions for examining students admitted based on this syllabus and who have not yet passed the course.
- For the assessment of an independent project (degree project), the examiner may also allow a student to add supplemental information after the deadline for submission. Read more in the Education Planning and Administration Handbook.
Responsible Department/Equivalent
Department of Urban and Rural Development
Supplementary information
Module set
| Title | Credits | Code |
|---|---|---|
| Communication theory | 7.5 | 0102 |
| Communication strategy | 7.5 | 0103 |
The Course Replaces
MX0097 och MX0098, MX0128, MX0140, MX0154
Other Information
The prerequisite 5 hp in communication theory is reached for example if the student has taken courses focusing on interpersonal or societal communication from an academic/theoretical perspective. This is fulfilled e.g. by students following the study plan for the Master’s programme in Environmental Communication at SLU.
- The right to participate in teaching and/or supervision only applies for the course instance the student was admitted to and registered on.
- If there are special reasons, students are entitled to participate in components with compulsory attendance when the course is given again. Read more in the Education Planning and Administration Handbook.
Introductory Readings
- Craig, R. T. (2005). How we talk about how we talk: Communication theory in the public interest. Journal of communication, 55(4), 659–667.
- Guldbrandsen, I. T., & Just, S. N. (2020). Chapter 1: Strategizing Communication. In: Strategizing Communication (2nd ed.). Studentlitteratur.
- Rödl, M., Mutter, A., Fischer, A., Calderon, C. & Hallgren, L. (2027). Chapter 7: Theorising Environmental Communication for Social Change. In: A Critical Introduction to Environmental Communication. London: Routledge.
Optional readings:
- Craig, R. T. (2013). Communication theory and social change. Communication & Social Change, 1(1), 5–18.
- Shove, E. (2010). Beyond the ABC: climate change policy and theories of social change. Environment and Planning A, 42(6), 1273–1285.
Readings on Communication as Influence
- Andersen, I. V. (2023). Rhetorical citizenship and the environment. Climate Resilience and Sustainability, 2(2), e249.
- Godemann, J. (2021). Communicating sustainability. Some thoughts and recommendations for enhancing sustainability communication. In F. Weder, L. Krainer, & M. Karmasin (Eds.), The Sustainability Communication Reader. Springer.
- Rödl, M., Mutter, A., Fischer, A., Calderon, C. & Hallgren, L. (2027). Chapter 13: Environmental Communication Campaigns. In: A Critical Introduction to Environmental Communication. London: Routledge.
- Steg, L., & Vlek, C. (2009). Encouraging pro-environmental behaviour: An integrative review and research agenda. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 29(3), 309–317.
Optional readings:
- Bünzli, F., & Eppler, M. J. (2019). Strategizing for social change in nonprofit contexts: A typology of communication approaches in public communication campaigns. Nonprofit Management and Leadership, 29(4), 491-508.
- Chaplain, J. (2026). Climate Crisis or Climate Emergency? Tracing Differing Temporal, Spatial, and Felt Constellations in Youth Climate Rhetorics. Environmental Communication.
- Tyson, B., & Unson, C. (2006). Environmental communication strategies: When is what appropriate? Management of Natural Resources, Sustainable Development and Ecological Hazards, 99, 83.
- Werder, K. P. (2014). A theoretical framework for strategic communication messaging. In: The Routledge handbook of strategic communication (pp. 293–308).
Readings on Communication as Interaction
- Halkier, B. (2017). Mundane science use in a practice theoretical perspective: Different understandings of the relations between citizen-consumers and public communication initiatives build on scientific claims. Public Understanding of Science, 26(1), 40-54.
- Humă, B., Stokoe, E., & Sikveland, R. O. (2020). Putting persuasion (back) in its interactional context. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 17(3), 357–371.
- Mead, G. H. (1934). In C. W. Morris (Ed.), Mind, self, and society: From the standpoint of a social behaviorist (pp. 253–260, 325–328). University of Chicago Press.
- Rödl, M., Mutter, A., Fischer, A., Calderon, C. & Hallgren, L. (2027). Chapter 11: Nature Interpretation as Environmental Communication. In: A Critical Introduction to Environmental Communication. London: Routledge
Optional readings:
- Berglez, P., & Olausson, U. (2021). Climate irresponsibility on social media. A critical approach to “high-carbon visibility discourse”. Social Semiotics, 1–15.
- Cox, J. R. (2010). Beyond frames: Recovering the strategic in climate communication. Environmental Communication, 4(1), 122–133.
- GTZ Rioplus. (2006). Strategic communication for sustainable development: A conceptual overview (pp. 2–4, 14–47). GTZ.
- Kings, D., & Ilbery, B. (2014). The lifeworlds of organic and conventional farmers in central-southern England: A phenomenological enquiry. Sociologia Ruralis, 55(1), 62–84.
- Paerregaard, K. (2020). Communicating the inevitable: Climate awareness, climate discord, and climate research in Peru’s highland communities. Environmental Communication, 14(1), 112–125.
- Theunissen, P., & Noordin, W. N. W. (2012). Revisiting the concept “dialogue” in public relations. Public relations review, 38(1), 5-13.
Readings on Communication as Societal Coordination
- Deetz, S. A. (1992). Democracy in an age of corporate colonization: Developments in communication and the politics of everyday life (pp. 173–198). SUNY Press.
- Fredriksson, M., & Pallas, J. (2014). Strategic communication as institutional work. In D. Holtzhausen & A. Zerfass (Eds.), The routledge handbook of strategic communication (pp. 167–180). Routledge.
- Habermas, J. (2001). Truth and society: The discursive redemption of factual claims to validity. In B. Fultner (Trans.), On the pragmatics of social interaction: Preliminary studies in the theory of communicative action (pp. 85–103). MIT Press.
- Rödl, M., Mutter, A., Fischer, A., Calderon, C. & Hallgren, L. (2027). Chapter 12: Environmental Communication in a Digital Society. In: A Critical Introduction to Environmental Communication. London: Routledge
Optional readings:
*- *Harsin, J. (2018). Post-truth and critical communication studies. In: Oxford research encyclopedia of communication.
- Luhmann, N. (1992). What is communication? Communication Theory, 2(3), 251–259.
- Nothhaft, H., & Wehmeier, S. (2007). Coping with complexity: Sociocybernetics as a framework for communication management. International Journal of Strategic Communication, 1(3), 151–168.
- Singer, N. R. (2020). Toward Intersectional Ecofeminist Communication Studies. Communication Theory, 30(3), 268–289.
Summative Readings on Theorising and Strategising Communication
- Craig, R. T. (2019). Models of communication in and as metadiscourse. In M. Bergman, K. Kirtiklis, & J. Siebers (Eds.), Models of communication (pp. 11–33). Routledge.
- Guldbrandsen, I. T., & Just, S. N. (2020). Chapter 4: Strategy as emergent action In: Strategizing Communication (2nd ed.). Studentlitteratur.
- Rödl, M. (2025). Understanding Communication as Both Constitutive and Instrumental: Implications and Challenges for Epistemic and Identity Development in Environmental Communication Education. Environmental Communication, 20(3): 531-547.
- Rödl, M., Mutter, A., Fischer, A., Calderon, C. & Hallgren, L. (2027). Chapter 9: The Professional Cultures of Environmental Communication. In: A Critical Introduction to Environmental Communication. London: Routledge.
Optional readings:
- Barge, J. K., & Craig, R. T. (2009). Practical theory in applied communication scholarship. In L. R. Frey & K. N. Cissna (Eds.), Routledge handbook of applied communication research (pp. 95–118). Routledge.
- Craig, R. T. (1999). Communication theory as a field. Communication Theory, 9(2), 119–161.
- Fredriksson, M., & Pallas, J. (2016). Diverging principles for strategic communication in government agencies. International Journal of Strategic Communication, 10(3), 153–164.
- Macnamara, J. (2018). A review of new evaluation models for strategic communication: Progress and gaps. International Journal of Strategic Communication, 12(2), 180–195.
- van Ruler, B. (2018). Communication Theory: An Underrated Pillar on Which Strategic Communication Rests. International Journal of Strategic Communication, 12(4), 367–381.
academic year 2025/2026
Communication theory and strategy (MX0158-20131)
2026-01-11 - 2026-02-01
academic year 2024/2025
Communication theory and strategy (MX0158-20112)
2025-01-15 - 2025-02-02
academic year 2023/2024
Communication theory and strategy (MX0158-20162)
2024-01-07 - 2024-01-28
academic year 2022/2023
Communication theory and strategy (MX0158-20131)
2023-01-08 - 2023-01-29