History, Students, and Education A Survey about Students’ Perspectives on History Education at the Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences and Implications for Future Teaching - Agrarhistoria 4
The aim of the survey was to investigate whether students at the Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences (SLU) think it is important to learn about history and if history taught at a university with strong emphasis on natural sciences should be general knowledge or specific knowledge. All programs taught at SLU touch upon social science and humanities in one way or another regardless if the program curricula reflect it or not. The connection between all educational programs and social science is expressed in the Act of Higher Education. History lingers over all educational programs at SLU.
The survey gathered the students’ perspectives on these questions and inquired about the students’ views on history and its relation to their education. Hence, the goal of this report is to discuss the students’ interest in history and how that interest is reflected in teaching at SLU. The overarching question is whether it is important that students graduating from SLU have knowledge in history—in particular, if students think knowledge of history is important and
what kinds of history they want to study. A survey is a useful tool since it makes it possible to study overall patterns about students’ history interests. Results from a survey allow discussion about differences among educational programs in their views on history education. This survey made it possible to discuss the relationships between educational programs, interest in history, and its implications for education.
The survey went to all registered undergraduate students including students in the longer professional programs like Agronomy and Forestry. For the longer programs, the survey also went to students in years 4 and 5 who are in the advanced-level or second-cycle degree program. A total of 865 students completed the survey, and the response rate was approximately 25%. Since students at SLU in many ways form a quite homogeneous group regarding such characteristics as ethnic background, age, and interest in the scope of a small, specialized university’s mission, the high response rate in this survey makes the result reliable. Forty percent (40%) of the students at SLU have high (34%) or very high (6%) interest in history. A majority of the students (56%) think they will improve in their future jobs if they have knowledge of their profession’s history. Only 15% do not think history knowledge will make them better in their professional careers. Half of the students (51%) think that a college education should always include some historical courses/components while 21% of the students are of the opposite opinion. When asked if they wanted more history linked to the education they study, the same percentages of students (34%) agree and disagree. This report presents how students in different educational programs perceive history and history education and makes it possible to compare educational programs as well as the opinions of students from different faculties.
When the students were asked what kind of history they are most interested in, many of them with low interest in general history showed high interest in history closely connected to their own education. SLU’s students’ commitment to their studies in general is reflected in their interest in history: history connected to their program is very important to them. For many students, it is easier to see the connection between history and land-use management than between history and treatment of animals or microbiology. Fewer students in the Veterinary Medicine program see a direct benefit of history compared to students in, for example, the Landscape Architecture program. The students who are taught history today appreciate the benefit of history more than students in programs with no history explicitly incorporated, and they think to a larger extent that a college education always should include some historical courses/components. Students whose coursework incorporates history could more easily comprehend its benefit. The survey clearly demonstrates that many students perceive history education as a subject they could benefit from in their profession. Students at SLU have a
utilitarian view on history. The survey has shown that many students think history is part of a general knowledge that students graduating from SLU should have. To fulfill the students’ requests for more general knowledge in history, SLU must rethink how history is integrated into its educational programs.
One major conclusion from the survey is that many students want open courses in history connected to their education, i.e. agrarian history, forest history, etc., not just one course with no option to advance to a higher level. The students are arguing for specific knowledge in history, and many students perceive history as an important component to add to their education program at SLU. To better use the professional knowledge in history that is present at SLU, i.e. Agrarian History at Ultuna, Forest History at Umeå, and Garden History at Alnarp, a closer cooperation between these groups would be beneficial. The Agrarian History program has always had extensive contact with society outside the university that can be further strengthened.