Environmental discourses and communication
Course evaluation
The course evaluation is now closed
LK0425-40038 - Course evaluation report
Once the evaluation is closed, the course coordinator and student representative have 1 month to draft their comments. The comments will be published in the evaluation report.
Additional course evaluations for LK0425
Academic year 2022/2023
Environmental discourses and communication (LK0425-40101)
2023-03-22 - 2023-06-04
Syllabus and other information
Syllabus
LK0425 Environmental discourses and communication, 15.0 Credits
Miljödiskurser och kommunikationSubjects
Landscape ArchitectureEducation cycle
Bachelor’s levelModules
Title | Credits | Code |
---|---|---|
Single module | 15.0 | 0101 |
Advanced study in the main field
First cycle, has less than 60 credits in first-cycle course/s as entry requirementsBachelor’s level (G1F)
Grading scale
The grade requirements within the course grading system are set out in specific criteria. These criteria must be available by the course start at the latest.
Language
EnglishPrior knowledge
Basic qualifications for basic education and knowledge corresponding to- 15 credits in forest science or
- 15 credits in forestry science or
- 15 credits in biology or
- 15 credits in environmental science or
- 15 credits environmental communication or
- 15 credits in landscape architecture or
- 15 credits agricultural science or
- 15 credits of natural resource management.
In addition, English B or equivalent is required. As the language of instruction is English, the Swedish language general entry requirement may not apply.
Objectives
The aim of the course is to provide the students with an understanding of forest and landscape as seen from a perspective of ethical choices, and to train the students ability to critically problematize and communicate options in those choices.
After completing the course the student should be able to
– identify how different environmental discourses may entail different understandings of, and consequenses for, sustainable development
– demonstrate an ability to describe, distinguish between and discuss different categories of disciplinary approaches to forest and landscape
– analyze challenges in translating the Sustainable Development Goals into concretes measures
– critically appraise ethics and values in forest and landscape dynamics from a global perspective
– discuss the temporal, spatial and cultural dimensions of how ethical choices today may have consequenses for generations of humans, bio-spheres, plant life, and ecosystems.
Content
During the course, the student develop an understanding of how the forest and the landscape are part of society. Socially critical perspectives are applied to conditions concerning e.g. relations between human and nature, ethics, culture, equality, politics and power. Perspectives from different disciplines and sectors will be discussed.
The course is divided into three modules. The first module deals with approaches to environmental discourses, as seen through different disciplinary lenses and geographical contexts (e.g. urban-rural, or global north- global south). Research and theory on ethics and power relations are introduced through literature and seminars. This module also train the students understanding of how ethics and communication, narratives and storytelling are related.
The second module aims to explores how discourses, values, norms and worldviews are translated into rhetorics, action and decision-making. Using agenda 2030 as a lens and working critically with the Sustainable Development Goals, the students train in analyzing ways of handling ethical conflicts. Real-life cases, from which the students will select for the case-study based assignment in module 3, are introduced.
The third module synthesizes the previous modules by application of the theoretical and communicative tools on selected cases. The students identify an ethical dilemma and develop potential approaches to cope with the dilemma. The assignment is presented through creative and sensible use of communication tools. This module relate to the previous modules by stressing reflection on ethics.
Compulsory moments for the three modules include: attendance to literature seminars and presentation of written reflection; developing an argumentation in a written assignment related to ethical conflicts and the Sustainable Development Goals; and presentation and communication of case study assignment.
Grading form
The grade requirements within the course grading system are set out in specific criteria. These criteria must be available by the course start at the latest.Formats and requirements for examination
Approved group work and oral presentation, as well as approved individual assignment. Completed compulsory moments.
If a student has failed an examination, the examiner has the right to issue supplementary assignments. This applies if it is possible and there are grounds to do so.
The examiner can provide an adapted assessment to students entitled to study support for students with disabilities following a decision by the university. Examiners may also issue an adapted examination or provide an alternative way for the students to take the exam.
If this syllabus is withdrawn, SLU may introduce transitional provisions for examining students admitted based on this syllabus and who have not yet passed the course.
For the assessment of an independent project (degree project), the examiner may also allow a student to add supplemental information after the deadline for submission. Read more in the Education Planning and Administration Handbook.
Other information
The right to participate in teaching and/or supervision only applies for the course instance the student was admitted to and registered on.
If there are special reasons, students are entitled to participate in components with compulsory attendance when the course is given again. Read more in the Education Planning and Administration Handbook.
Additional information
SLU is environmentally certified according to ISO 14001. A large part of our courses cover knowledge and skills that contribute positively to the environment. To further strengthen this, we have specific environmental goals for the education. Students are welcome to suggest actions regarding the course’s content and implementation that lead to improvements for the environment. For more information, see webpage www.slu.se.Responsible department
Department of Landscape Architecture, Planning and Management
Litterature list
Brulle, R. J. (2010). From Environmental Campaigns to Advancing the Public Dialogue: Environmental Communication for Civic Engagement, Environmental Communication, 4(1), pp. 82-98
Bylund, J. (2019). Adopting dilemmas and reflexivity –on-the-go, SCAPE, 16, pp. 40-47.
Cox, R. and Pezzullo, P. (2018). Environmental communication and the public sphere. 5th edition. Sage publications: Washington DC.
- Chapter 1: Defining Environmental Communication
- Chapter 13: Environmental conflict managements and collaboration
Edwards, P. et al. (2022). Development of forest discourses across Europe: A longitudinal perspective, Forest Policy and Economics, 135, 102641.
Fors, H et al. (2021). Striving for Inclusion—A Systematic Review of Long-Term Participation in Strategic Management of Urban Green Spaces, Front. Sustain. Cities, 3:572423. doi: 10.3389/frsc.2021.572423
Lidskog, R. and Löfmarck, E. (2016). Fostering a flexible forest: Challenges and strategies in the advisory practice of a deregulated forest management system, Forest Policy and Economics, 62, pp. 177–183.
Vogel, N. et al. (2020). Ethical dimensions in landscape governance and management. In: Randrup, T.B. & Jansson, M. (eds.) Urban Open Space Governance and Management. Routledge.