Master thesis in Economics, A2E - Agriculture Programme - Economics and Management
An independent project is a project where you will apply your in-depth knowledge, skills and approach to an issue in the field of the education. Often, the independent project is at the end of your education where you will plan, conduct and present an academic study. Your project will be published publicly.
Information from the course leader
Varmt välkommen till Sveriges Lantbruksuniversitet och kursen Självständigt arbete i Nationalekonomi, A2E!
Här kommer allmän information om registrering på kurs, samt annan praktisk information:
Registrering på kurs
Ingen självregistrering tillämpas i denna kurs då samtliga studenter antas med villkor. Efter att kursen startat kommer kursledaren att återkomma till administrationen med en registreringslista där vi manuellt registrerar studenterna. Frågor om möjlig registrering vid villkorsantagning tas direkt med kursledaren.
Särskilt studiestöd
Har du behov av särskilt stöd ska du informera kursledaren om det redan vid kursstart så att eventuella särskilda arrangemang kan ordnas. Mer information finner du här: https://student.slu.se/studieservice/studiestod/funka/
Avbrott på kurs
Om du avbryter kursen skall du meddela utbildningsadministrationen på econ-edu@slu.se som i sin tur meddelar kursledaren och lägger in ett avbrott i Ladok efter studentens godkännande. Du kan själv anmäla tidigt avbrott (inom 3 veckor efter kursstart) via Ladok Student på studentwebben.
Tveka inte att höra av dig till econ-edu@slu.se vid frågor.
Hälsningar,
Administrationen
Course evaluation
The course evaluation is now closed
EX0907-30203 - Course evaluation report
Once the evaluation is closed, the course coordinator and student representative have 1 month to draft their comments. The comments will be published in the evaluation report.
Additional course evaluations for EX0907
Academic year 2023/2024
Master thesis in Economics, A2E - Agriculture Programme - Economics and Management (EX0907-30317)
2024-01-15 - 2024-06-02
Academic year 2023/2024
Master thesis in Economics, A2E - Agriculture Programme - Economics and Management (EX0907-10364)
2023-08-28 - 2024-01-14
Academic year 2022/2023
Master thesis in Economics, A2E - Agriculture Programme - Economics and Management (EX0907-30132)
2023-01-16 - 2023-06-04
Academic year 2022/2023
Master thesis in Economics, A2E - Agriculture Programme - Economics and Management (EX0907-10144)
2022-08-29 - 2023-01-15
Academic year 2021/2022
Master thesis in Economics, A2E - Agriculture Programme - Economics and Management (EX0907-10234)
2021-08-30 - 2022-01-16
Academic year 2020/2021
Master thesis in Economics, A2E - Agriculture Programme - Economics and Management (EX0907-30189)
2021-01-18 - 2021-06-06
Academic year 2020/2021
Master thesis in Economics, A2E - Agriculture Programme - Economics and Management (EX0907-10203)
2020-08-31 - 2021-01-17
Academic year 2019/2020
Master thesis in Economics, A2E - Agriculture Programme - Economics and Management (EX0907-30166)
2020-01-20 - 2020-06-07
Academic year 2019/2020
Master thesis in Economics, A2E - Agriculture Programme - Economics and Management (EX0907-10167)
2019-09-02 - 2020-01-19
Academic year 2018/2019
Master thesis in Economics, A2E - Agriculture Programme - Economics and Management (EX0907-30207)
2019-01-21 - 2019-06-09
Academic year 2018/2019
Master thesis in Economics, A2E - Agriculture Programme - Economics and Management (EX0907-10243)
2018-09-03 - 2019-01-20
Syllabus and other information
Syllabus
EX0907 Master thesis in Economics, A2E - Agriculture Programme - Economics and Management, 30.0 Credits
Självständigt arbete i Nationalekonomi, A2E - Agronomprogrammet - ekonomiSubjects
EconomicsEducation cycle
Master’s levelModules
Title | Credits | Code |
---|---|---|
Single module | 30.0 | 0301 |
Advanced study in the main field
Second cycle, contains degree project for Master of Arts/Master of Science (120 credits)Master’s level (A2E)
Grading scale
The grade requirements within the course grading system are set out in specific criteria. These criteria must be available by the course start at the latest.
Language
SwedishPrior knowledge
Knowledge equivalent to 30 credits at second-cycle level in economics. A Pass grade for the independent project at first-cycle level, or a Bachelor’s degree. The student must have completed at least one course relevant to the subject of the independent project before starting the project. Knowledge of English equivalent to English 6.Objectives
The aim of the course is for the student, based on previously acquired knowledge, to independently plan, carry out and present an academic study within a given time frame. Through the independent project, the student will develop their skills in the academic work process and deepen their subject knowledge considerably.
On completion of the course, the student will be able to:
independently and creatively identify and formulate scientific questions;
independently search, compile, evaluate and critically interpret relevant information and literature;
independently plan and, using adequate methods, carry out a scientific study within given time frames;
analyse and evaluate data and/or findings on a scientific basis;
discuss contents and conclusions in a scientific work critically, and reflect on how the choice of question and method relates to the scientific and practical basis of the subject;
reflect on social and ethical aspects, sustainability aspects within the subject as well as ethical aspects of research and development;
present a scientific work in accordance with the prevailing practice of the discipline, adapted to the intended audience and according to the instructions given;
write a summary in English of a scientific report according to the instructions given;
write a popular science summary of a scientific work according to the instructions given;
present a scientific work orally and critically review and discuss, as well as give constructive criticism of, another student’s project, including method, conclusions and the context of the work in a wider perspective;
identify their own skill and knowledge development needs in the subject of the project.
relate the scientific questions to the agriculture sector’s complex system of resources and value-creating processes.
Content
The course involves carrying out an independent, academic project (degree project) under supervision. The project is to be carried out independently, using data collected by the student themselves, or equivalent data. The project should preferably be carried out individually, but the course coordinator can admit exceptions under certain circumstances. The set-up of the independent project should be documented in a work plan established in consultation with the supervisor before the project starts.
The project is to be presented orally and in writing, as seminars or an equivalent format, and according to the instructions given. The course also involves taking part in a public discussion of another student’s project in order to assess the ability to give constructive criticism.
Grading form
The grade requirements within the course grading system are set out in specific criteria. These criteria must be available by the course start at the latest.Formats and requirements for examination
A Pass grade for the written report and the oral presentation, as well as a Pass grade for the critical review of another student’s project. If the work has been carried out in pairs, it must be made clear to the examiner what each individual has contributed; this applies to both the written report and the oral presentation. The work effort and the scope of the work should correspond to 30 credits for each student, and each student must fulfil all intended learning outcomes. - If the student has not received a Pass grade for a test, the examiner has the right to give a supplementary assignment, provided this is feasible and can be justified.
If the student has been granted learning support due to a disability, the examiner has the right to offer an adapted test or let the student take the test in an alternative manner.
If this course syllabus is changed, or if the course is discontinued, SLU shall decide on transition rules for examination of students admitted under this syllabus but who have not yet completed the course.
For the examination of an independent project (degree project), the examiner may also allow the student to add supplemental information after the submission date. For more information, please refer to the regulations for education at Bachelor’s and Master’s level.
If a student has failed an examination, the examiner has the right to issue supplementary assignments. This applies if it is possible and there are grounds to do so.
The examiner can provide an adapted assessment to students entitled to study support for students with disabilities following a decision by the university. Examiners may also issue an adapted examination or provide an alternative way for the students to take the exam.
If this syllabus is withdrawn, SLU may introduce transitional provisions for examining students admitted based on this syllabus and who have not yet passed the course.
For the assessment of an independent project (degree project), the examiner may also allow a student to add supplemental information after the deadline for submission. Read more in the Education Planning and Administration Handbook.
Other information
The right to participate in teaching and/or supervision only applies for the course instance the student was admitted to and registered on.
If there are special reasons, students are entitled to participate in components with compulsory attendance when the course is given again. Read more in the Education Planning and Administration Handbook.
Additional information
Degree project courses for professional degrees have Swedish as the language of instruction but the degree project can be written in English.Once the student has received a Pass grade for the written report, this must be published in the SLU system for electronic publication (Epsilon), and checked for plagiarism. To be admitted to the course, the student must have an agreement with the supervising department concerning supervisor and the subject of the project.
Students are recommended to take a course corresponding to at least 5 credits in scientific methodology before starting their independent project. This requirement is fulfilled by students who follow the syllabus for SLU degree programmes. Students who have not completed an undergraduate programme at SLU are urged to take the web-based teaching components provided for undergraduate-level independent projects. A course in scientific methodology is any course or course component that contributes to the student fulfilling the qualification requirement of advanced method knowledge in the main field of study. The right to participate in teaching and/or supervision only applies to the course date the student has been admitted to and registered on.
Responsible department
Department of Economics
Grading criteria
Grading Criteria for MSc Projects in Economics at the Department of Economics, SLU, 2022
Rob Hart
In addition to completion or participation in any mandatory elements of the course as detailed on Canvas, the following criteria will be used to grade the theses.
Grades.
3: All of the `Required' properties.
4: All of the `Required' properties, and 4 of the `Good' properties.
5: All of the `Required', 4 of the `Good' properties, and 2 of the `Excellent' properties.
1. Problem definition.
“Required”: An economic problem (the solution of which has potential for contribution to knowledge) is defined clearly and early on. The problem is defined such that the student has a reasonable chance of providing non-trivial evidence for or against it within the constraints of the course. The thesis is clearly situated by the author in the scientific debate, and appropriate references help the reader to deepen their knowledge of that debate.
“Good”: + Relevant problem (potential for useful contribution to knowledge) based on good review of literature.
“Excellent”: + Novel problem (potential for significant contribution to knowledge) based on critical review of literature.
2. Methodology.
“Required”: The student carried out the study; any data used in the study is accurately described and referenced; the method is appropriate to problem and available data; the method is competently applied; the plausibility of results is discussed and judged appropriately, paying particular attention to weaknesses in analysis; there is a reaction on choice of method. Where weaknesses in the analysis are severe, alternative methods are discussed that might (in future work) help to overcome these weaknesses.
“Good”: + Fair degree of own initiative in planning (supervisor input!); method well-suited to problem; method well applied; plausibility of results thoroughly discussed and judged appropriately; good reaction on choice of method.
“Excellent”: + High degree of own initiative in planning (supervisor input!); method very well suited to problem; method very well applied; code and analysis are very well documented.
3. Discussion.
“Required”: Results appropriately discussed in relation to existing scientic and policy literature
(e.g. relevance for policy, or for theory).
“Good”: + Results critically discussed in relation to the existing literature.
“Excellent”: + Results perceptively discussed in relation to the existing literature.
4. Scientic writing.
“Required”: Appropriate language throughout; logical structure consistent with practice; references presented and organized appropriately and consistently. No more than 12,000 words (excluding appendices and references).
“Good”: + Very clear structure, appropriate to the problem; almost no typos and grammar mistakes; well formatted.
5. Presentation.
“Required”: Present and discuss the thesis in a comprehensible manner at the time appointed by the examiner, and within the allotted time. Act as discussant for one other thesis, as instructed by the examiner, within the allotted time. Attend at least 3 thesis seminars in addition to those at which they present and discuss.
“Good”: + Presentation of thesis as a poster at thesis day or in a comparable event or form.